<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Photo Frame Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zedomax.com/blog/2008/10/31/digital-photo-frame-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zedomax.com/blog/2008/10/31/digital-photo-frame-reviews/</link>
	<description>Zedomax - The DIY, HOWTO, Mod, Hacks, Gadgets, and Tech Blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:21:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://zedomax.com/blog/2008/10/31/digital-photo-frame-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-401113</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zedomax.com/blog/?p=10709#comment-401113</guid>
		<description>Actually the SmartParts has 800x480 pixel LCD panel, please look here:

http://www.amazon.com/Smartparts-SP70D-Black-Digital-Picture/dp/B0010WNNKQ

I believe there&#039;s a big quality difference between 800x600 and 800x480 almost 120 pixels.

Not trying 2 be a smart ass but I am simply stating facts here. Thanks for commenting btw. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the SmartParts has 800&#215;480 pixel LCD panel, please look here:</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/Smartparts-SP70D-Black-Digital-Picture/dp/B0010WNNKQ" >http://www.amazon.com/Smartparts-SP70D-Black-Digital-Picture/dp/B0010WNNKQ</a></p>
<p>I believe there&#8217;s a big quality difference between 800&#215;600 and 800&#215;480 almost 120 pixels.</p>
<p>Not trying 2 be a smart ass but I am simply stating facts here. Thanks for commenting btw. <img src='http://zedomax.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://zedomax.com/blog/2008/10/31/digital-photo-frame-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-400876</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zedomax.com/blog/?p=10709#comment-400876</guid>
		<description>You wrote: &quot;For 8″ digital photo frames, GiiNii offers clear advantage over SmartParts with slightly better resolution of 800×600 over 800×480 pixels.  Of course, you’d pay a little more but we’d say the extra resolution is worth the extra 20 bucks.&quot;
This is incorrect.  Both have virtually the same resolution, just different aspect ratios.  4:3 vs. 16:9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote: &#8220;For 8″ digital photo frames, GiiNii offers clear advantage over SmartParts with slightly better resolution of 800×600 over 800×480 pixels.  Of course, you’d pay a little more but we’d say the extra resolution is worth the extra 20 bucks.&#8221;<br />
This is incorrect.  Both have virtually the same resolution, just different aspect ratios.  4:3 vs. 16:9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
