Bookmark, share, and hop your favorite sites with SiteHoppin Toolbar for Firefox!

Seitz 6×17 Digital camera - 160 MegaPixel Camera!

Posted in Consumer, Cool, Digital Cameras by max on the January 15th, 2008 at 9:35 pm

Seitz 6×17 Digital camera

This has got to be the coolest looking camera with 160 MegaPixels!!! Gosh, that means you need like a 100 GB harddrive to hold like 300 pictures.

seitz has outdone everything in its class with its mind-umbing 160-megapixel 6×17 digital camera. (Sorry, we got that wrong: there’s nothing else in its class!) You got that right—one hundred and sixty MP. Couple that with 48-bit colour depth, and you get images of definitions we can’t speak about. At the maximum resolution, an image is 900 MB, and you can’t use lash to store several such—so the 6×17 uses a Mac Mini as its storage device. You can control the camera remotely using a PDA. Go ahead, prove you’re a real photography enthusiast: sell your house and buy the 6×17…

via usgadget , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...


Related Posts

Bookmark It!


|del.icio.us |Digg it |Netscape |SiteHoppin |Wagg It | Email this to a Friend Email This Post Email This Post

If you like this post then please subscribe to my full feed RSS. You can also subscribe by Email.

Got a new hack, DIY, howto, or gadget? Tip us here.

Search for a new Hack:



RSS feed

2 Comments »

Comment by Sally
2008-01-31 11:29:46

Waoooo——- COOL — Is it reall & howz it results going to be ?

MyAvatars 0.2
 
Comment by camera man Subscribed to comments via email
2008-03-12 21:02:15

Man that thing is huge… I have never seen anything like that before, 160 megapixels is insane :)

MyAvatars 0.2
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.