Comments on: Big Airplane

By: zedomax

zedomax — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:22:29 +0000

Prove it!

By: zedomax

zedomax — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:22:29 +0000

Prove it!

By: hansel

hansel — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:30:38 +0000

that “big” airplane is some cut and paste photoshopping…

By: zedomax

zedomax — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:02:25 +0000

Yes, it is obviously fake.

By: zedomax

zedomax — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:02:25 +0000

Yes, it is obviously fake.

By: tempted

tempted — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:32:33 +0000

Obviously Photoshopped fake. The two opposing fuselages seemingly mounted on each wing are perfectly identicle, right down to the reflections of the tarmac under each one – they are the same image superimposed on either side. A similar reflection from the taramac (only enlarged) can be seen on the superimposed center jet turbine – Photoshopped and cut from a wing & enlarged to fit the fuselage in the photo.

By: dissapointed

dissapointed — Fri, 29 May 2009 02:00:49 +0000

dude thats photo shoped

By: JD

JD — Thu, 28 May 2009 03:00:10 +0000

photoshop…

By: aj

aj — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:46:04 +0000

FAKE

By: gen. patton

gen. patton — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 22:16:02 +0000

DIS PLANE IS the heroconda xb-52 it will kill u because it is piloted by osama bin lodinnn
PHOTOPSHOPED BY OSAMA THE TERROTIST CANDY MAN OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO

By: gerrit de boer

gerrit de boer — Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:40:21 +0000

hahaha

By: Romanator

Romanator — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:29:44 +0000

possibly you mean the movie “tremors”.

By: Jesse Richardson

Jesse Richardson — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:30:34 +0000

Let me tell you the real reason why you will never see this in real life… payload. The size (volume) of the passenger cabin on an airliner is much larger than the combined size of it’s engines. If this picture were real the genious engineer would have given up about 300 +/- seats in the main fuselage in return for much less under the wing. Seats are what make money. This concept, however, is not about feasibility but ingenuity. I’d like to see it work.

By: Triple88a

Triple88a — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:05:21 +0000

Obviously the image is a photo shop however let me tell you the reason why you will never see this in real life. The people are way too close to the ground during takeoffs and landings which put them in very harms way. There have been multiple landings where one of the engines on the wings touches the ground and gets damaged. The people are up high so they are safe. In this concept, they will be injured or dead.

By: mitchfd

mitchfd — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:32:43 +0000

OMG. looks real, am convinced. haaaaa

By: DMP

DMP — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:07:42 +0000

Actually you can have two pilots in seperat cockpits. Look up a F-82. It was originally designed from two P-51 Mustangs. The first design used a pilot in each cockpit so that they could switch off during long flights. However, the left side pilot was latter replaced with radar equipment. It was a pretty interesting design which saw some action during the Korean War.

By: lox

lox — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:49:36 +0000

But how can you fly this airplane???????????????????????????????????? Because you can”t have pilots on both planes.
Right? I’m sure I’m right.

By: Software

Software — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:38:51 +0000

Super plane I like the joke.

By: mra

mra — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:03:54 +0000

Look at the “left cockpit. It’s the same size, …and it is sitting on the ground!?

By: jkfjddjgdjgjklgjuudofhjhjkvhjkvfm,vmvsfdjkjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:46:34 +0000

IT IS PHOTOSHOPED BECAUSE THE COCKPIT ON THE RIGHT HAS SOME EXHAST COMING FROM THE BACK OF IT NOW WHY WOULD THERE BE EXHAUST ON THE BACK OF A PASSANGER COCKPIT

By: Katrina

Katrina — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:21:55 +0000

Good photoshop job though…minus a few little flaws that give it away

By: Izl

Izl — Wed, 29 Aug 2007 02:55:23 +0000

that reminds me of that movie with the giant worms.. (DUNE?)

By: max

max — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:24:05 +0000

really? I thought it was real…darn…

By: austin

austin — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:32:53 +0000

yea its not real someone photoshoped the front onto the intakes and you can still see the reflection of the wing on the side of the plain to tell it was photoshoped

By: plasma2002

plasma2002 — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:45:06 +0000

actually, now that i look at it more, theres a few more things that give it away. haha… look at the cockpit windows. Theres an identical set of people in each. Also the reflections on the two main parts both show the right wing, which obviously wouldnt work. But still…. thats awesome lol

By: plasma2002

plasma2002 — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:41:23 +0000

from the looks of the size of the tires, i’d say that it was totally photoshopped.
Probably for a site like worth1000.com or something or another.

By: plm

plm — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:42:59 +0000

Uhhh, this photoshopped image has been around for years. No more posting-while-drunk please.

By: garrett

garrett — Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:30:09 +0000

It’s not real, Max….

By: umf

umf — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:27:07 +0000

Confirmed, it's a fake. That plane it's named "Iguazú Falls" and it's a Boeing 777-206. Searching for KLM and Iguazú at airliners.net gives you that

By: umf

umf — Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:11:07 +0000

Whatever, obviously it’s photoshoped. Just look at the reflections.